Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence

From: Walter J. Ferstl (walter.j.ferstl_at_netway.at)
Date: Sat Jul 28 2001 - 09:46:13 EDT

Next message: Mitch Vice: "Re: [NTLK] Ethernet Card for Newton"
Previous message: DJ: "Re: [NTLK] Life with MAC OS X & the New G4 Macs"
Maybe in reply to: Ivan T. Shaw: "[NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Next in thread: Lallang_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri Jul 27 2001 - 18:47:40 EDT,
Jeremy Bond Shepherd <jbond_at_eskimo.com> wrote:

>You could do what I did: buy an inexpensive 5-port 10Mb hub and plug the
>Newt and the desktop into the hub, and the hub into the wall. The major
>drawback is you'll need AC for the hub. Too bad nobody makes a
>battery-operated portable 10BaseT hub...
>
Jeremy,

Maybe you are prepared to do some DIY work?

If so, look at this URL (a 5-port hub with a small form factor being used):

"Battery-Powered Ethernet Hub"
http://www.kan.org/networking/batteryhub.html

To me, it does not look like it were too difficult...

Best regards,

Walter.

_______________________________________________________________________

walter j. ferstl

        c a r r i e r
        kommunikations- und netzdienste
        michael-gaismayr-str. 7, a-6020 innsbruck, austria
        fon: ++43 512 560 565, fax: ++43 512 561 934

http://www.carrier.co.at/

It comes to be that the bright light at the end of the tunnel
is just a freight train coming your way...

_______________________________________________________________________

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Mitch Vice: "Re: [NTLK] Ethernet Card for Newton"
Previous message: DJ: "Re: [NTLK] Life with MAC OS X & the New G4 Macs"
Maybe in reply to: Ivan T. Shaw: "[NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Next in thread: Lallang_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:50:26 EDT