Re: [NTLK] "Special" characters on the list

From: Laurent Daudelin (laurent_daudelin_at_fanniemae.com)
Date: Wed Nov 07 2001 - 13:29:32 EST


on 11/7/01 12:51 PM, Eric L. Strobel at fyzycyst_at_home.com wrote:

> at the temporal coordinates: 11/7/01 12:39 PM, the entity known as Victor
> Rehorst at victor_at_newtontalk.net conveyed the following:
>
>>
>> On Wed, 7 Nov 2001, Marco Mailand wrote:
>>
>>> You caught me! And you're completely right:
>>> It should be: Viele Gr=FC=DFe!
>>> But I think this would never be transmitted and arrive as I wrote. All th=
>> ose
>>> special characters will be mangled and transformed into whatsoever and
>>> everybody will get something else. So what's really wrong with it:
>>> - =E4, =F6, =FC, =C4, =D6 and =DC can be replaced with ae, oe, ue, Ae, Oe=
>> and Ue as is
>>
>> Notice how in Marco's post the characters came out alright. That's
>> because his mail client specifies the ISO-8859-1 character set, which
>> Listar *can* handle (and which is better anyways).
>>
>
> I think I missed this somewhere (the original quoted reference). However, I
> got all *kinds* of =this and =that in your message (in the stuff you
> quoted). Plus Outlook warning me that "This message may not be displayed
> properly because it contains an unknown character set."

Same for me in Entourage. The initial message from Marco quoted above did
appear fine, with all foreign characters being displayed properly. Now, with
Victor's reply, we start to see those characters being replaced with
printed-quotable things like =E4 and the likes. This is what is very
annoying!

-Laurent.

-- 
=====================================================================
Laurent Daudelin              Developer, Multifamily, ESO, Fannie Mae
mailto:Laurent_Daudelin_at_fanniemae.com             Washington, DC, USA
********************** Usual disclaimers apply **********************
cargo cult programming n.: A style of (incompetent) programming dominated by
ritual inclusion of code or program structures that serve no real purpose. A
cargo cult programmer will usually explain the extra code as a way of
working around some bug encountered in the past, but usually neither the bug
nor the reason the code apparently avoided the bug was ever fully understood
(compare shotgun debugging, voodoo programming). 

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:02:17 EST