[NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking

From: SlashDevNull (SlashDevNull_at_mac.com)
Date: Sun Nov 11 2001 - 17:32:12 EST

Next message: Mikebridg_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] Veterans Day..."
Previous message: Thaxton Beesley: "Re: [NTLK] (OT) Linux on Mac"
In reply to: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] MP 2100 upgrades by Dr. Newton"
Next in thread: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Maybe reply: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Maybe reply: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Salutations,

I really don't mean to get picky, but we need to came up with a
standardized way to mark off-topic messages.

[OT] (OT) 'OT' or any other way

I really don't care which way, but we need to make it uniform so that the
filters will always work.

Cheers,
David

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Mikebridg_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] [NTLK][OT] Veterans Day..."
Previous message: Thaxton Beesley: "Re: [NTLK] (OT) Linux on Mac"
In reply to: SlashDevNull: "[NTLK] MP 2100 upgrades by Dr. Newton"
Next in thread: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Maybe reply: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Maybe reply: Sushi: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] vs. (OT) or Off topic marking"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:02:37 EST