No problem, I also said that I don't like the idea I suggested :-). I do see
peoples points about the large volume of mail though. I agree with Victor that
keeping it all in one place is the way forward, filters are your friends.
All the best
Matthew
> In a previous message, Matthew Robinson typed vigorously:
>
> >I stated that a master list would be the superset of these. People could
> >then choose to get all or a selection.
>
> Ah yes, so you did. And of course, that makes a bit more sense. My
> apologies for reading faster than my brain could comprehend.
>
> However, I think you're still inviting confusion and crosstalk be
> attempting to maintain so many individually targeted and themed lists. If
> email was actually built to handle and automatically understand threads
> on different topics, then it wouldn't be simple text-based electronic
> mail anymore... it would be something else altogether. It would probably
> be MS Outlook running off of a bank of Exchange messaging servers.
>
> g.
>
> ......................................................................
>
> Grant Hutchinson Interface Considerations & Toys
>
> Live video served fresh since 1996. http://www.splorp.com/cam/
> Now fortified with daily ramblings. http://www.splorp.com/blog/
> Newton. It's the Palm with a brain. http://www.splorp.com/newton/
>
>
>
> --
> This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
> To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
> mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
>
>
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:03:38 EST