Re: [NTLK] SER-001 Status

From: SlashDevNull (slashdevnull_at_mac.com)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2001 - 14:36:31 EST

Next message: Zachery Bir: "Re: [NTLK] Potential for large number of bounced messages?"
Previous message: Benjamin: "Re: [NTLK] Potential for large number of bounced messages?"
In reply to: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 Status"
Next in thread: BK: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 Status"
Reply: BK: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 Status"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Hello,

Personally I prefer my choice. I kept the vette and my sanity and got rid
of the wife and those looks.

Amazing how much peace of mind is worth.

David

>
> On 11/28/01 1:56 PM, "Humphreys, David" <david.humphreys_at_honeywell.com>
> wrote:
> [snip!]
>> Although I will try to respond to everyone that emails me, there
>> is only so much time I can devote to this before my wife
>> gives me 'The look'.(You married guys know what I mean.)
>
> Oh yes! Oh yes! Oh yes! Oh yes! Oh yes! Oh yes! Oh yes! Oh yes!
>
> I know what you mean!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> -Laurent.

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Zachery Bir: "Re: [NTLK] Potential for large number of bounced messages?"
Previous message: Benjamin: "Re: [NTLK] Potential for large number of bounced messages?"
In reply to: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 Status"
Next in thread: BK: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 Status"
Reply: BK: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001 Status"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:04:04 EST