Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses

From: Brian Pearce (bpearce_at_cloud9.net)
Date: Wed Sep 05 2001 - 20:54:27 EDT

Next message: Seth Vidal: "Re: [NTLK] blasphemy and maybe some hope"
Previous message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] blasphemy and maybe some hope"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Next in thread: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>I couldn't agree more, though I'm not advocating illegality here,
>abandonware has a category on it's own as far as I'm concerned.

I'm not *not* advocating illegality here; software for an abandoned platform is certainly one of the more interesting shades of grey area in the personal definition of what is and isn't appropriate. (And if it actually worked, I'd certainly have *tried* the Dragon demo, as well.) But I do believe people should, at the very least, give some thought to the choice they're making.

BRIAN/bpearce_at_cloud9.net

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Seth Vidal: "Re: [NTLK] blasphemy and maybe some hope"
Previous message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] blasphemy and maybe some hope"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Next in thread: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Shareware/Freeware Licenses"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:01:16 EDT