Re: [NTLK] More on law

From: Guy MITTAUX (guy.mittaux_at_free.fr)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 19:46:26 EDT

Next message: Eric Byrne: "Re: [NTLK] NOISE(Re: More on Law)"
Previous message: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] NOISE(Re: More on Law)"
In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] More on law"
Next in thread: Templarsog1_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] More on law"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Excuse me guys, but I think you are not on the good list for that.

I am receiving now more than 200 mails a day and I cannot read them all.

I join Laurent and other, PLEASE continue off list.

We all have not to go through law to know what is good and bad and the difference
between Microsoft and a small independant developper.

If you do not agree, I would like that the one who never made any illegal copy of
soft/music/... throw me the first stone and stop this discussion NOW

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Eric Byrne: "Re: [NTLK] NOISE(Re: More on Law)"
Previous message: Christopher Plummer: "Re: [NTLK] NOISE(Re: More on Law)"
In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] More on law"
Next in thread: Templarsog1_at_aol.com: "Re: [NTLK] More on law"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:01:37 EDT