> While trying to be respectful and not disparaging of your position, what,
> then, do you think is the solution that ends the violence? If reponding
> in-kind is bad/escalates it, and doing nothing encourages it/fails to end
> it, how can any intermediary position be any better inasmuch as both
> extreme ends don't stop it?
>
> Judy Perry
dear judy,
maybe the western/northern countries should take more active participation
in summits like durban, i dont know. i guess there are plenty of ways.
i doubt this type of act would have taken place even under president
clinton. bush has made a lot of ppl desperate during his nine months in
charge, desperate enough to become suicide bombers.
if we westerners would listen more, maybe terror acts like this could be
avoided in the future. i dont want to justify the terorists but there are
most probably other ways of responding than extreme measures.
roman pixell
_________karmatic_experience_group__
mailto: roman_at_karmatic.com
phone: +46 (0) 8 242 606
fax: +46 (0) 8 598 14 954
cell: +46 (0) 709 10 35 51
web: www.pixell.net/doppler
icq user number: 3698764
____________________________________
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:01:46 EDT