> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 04:53:29 -0400
> From: Mark Rollins <mark_at_mrollins.com>
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] Newbie Question (now Palm/Newt comparison)
>
>> > From: "john_fraser_at_mac.com" <john_fraser_at_mac.com>
>> Let me guess - you're suffering from "horror of digital-devicelessliness"
> Of course, I'd hate to try a new beer and not have my beer ratings
> database with me.
It's the little things... ;)
> animation in PortaPam (Pamela Anderson in the palm of your hand!) is
> much more fluid!
> Actually there's something vaguely unsettling about that last sentence.
..yuck, no comment... *g*
>> > MP2000/2100 was the size of it's screen only, say with 2 stacked PC card
>> Heck, can't one do that? Can't one design such a case, and just transplant
> It could be done; cutting and folding the circuit board, flat LiIon
> pack; if I ever
> got an MP2100 used cheap, I might try it, it'd be thicker but smaller.
Seems to be one of the basic problems - we can't waste ressources
experimenting.
Couldn't we dig out that landfill Apple dumped the unsold units in?
Oliver :)
-- Anybody thinking your MP2100 to be some kind of Super-Palm? Just tell them that the Newt is what the Palm DEVOLVED from! http://www.newtontalk.net/ Newtontalk is back!-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Oct 03 2001 - 12:02:20 EDT