on 8/30/02 1:48 PM, Ken Hagler at khagler_at_orange-road.com wrote:
>> I think that the negative reaction some are having, myself included, with
>> the results of your study have more to do with the fact that we, as a group,
>> were being studied for the purpose of publication *without* our explicit
>> knowledge or permission than with your specific observations/conclusions.
>
> That's not what happened. Back in February they (quite publicly) asked
> people on the list to answer a series of questions. I was one of the people
> who did, in fact. Writing and emailing answers to those questions pretty
> clearly counts as explicit knowledge and permission.
OK, I must have missed that one... Or else I responded and am now having
one COLOSSAL senior moment... :-)
- Eric.
--Eric Strobel (fyzycyst_at_NOSPAM^mailaps.org)
===================================================================== You can lead an idiot to knowledge, but you can't make him think... =====================================================================
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Sep 05 2002 - 10:05:57 EDT