Re: [NTLK] Newton R&D

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Thu Dec 05 2002 - 15:28:45 EST

Next message: Stephen Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs Alphasmart Dana"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Palm negative comments (was eMate vs Alphasmart Dana)"
In reply to: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] Newton R&D"
Next in thread: Andrew Thiel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton R&D"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 05-12-2002 9:11, Paul Guyot at pguyot_at_kallisys.net wrote:

> Hence the emulation idea. It would have been crazy two years ago
> considering then hardware. But today hardware could handle that
> properly.

And the hardware will be even faster and probably cheaper by the time you're
finished...

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Stephen Jendraszak: "Re: [NTLK] eMate vs Alphasmart Dana"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Palm negative comments (was eMate vs Alphasmart Dana)"
In reply to: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] Newton R&D"
Next in thread: Andrew Thiel: "Re: [NTLK] Newton R&D"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 10:01:53 EST