Pocket Quicken might not be the best candidate because it doesn't
support the most basic of transaction types...split transactions. In
addition the source code is inaccessible. Pocket Money on the other
hand is much more robust and the developer may be interested in
participation.
- Joe Solin
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:28:21 -0800
Subject: Re: [NTLK] Next steps for NewtSync? My thoughts...
From: John Anderson <dearjohn_at_everchanging.com>
I'd actually love to see this too, although this is far past my
available time.
Third-party development opportunity, perhaps?
John Anderson
everchanging
On Wednesday, December 11, 2002, at 07:24 AM, Chris Myers wrote:
> I would like to see Pocket Quicken be sync'd through nSync to Quicken
> 2003. If
> so I could finally toss OS 9.
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 10:02:15 EST