Re: [NTLK] ATTENTION. Please read this.

From: Ashley Campbell (awc2_at_andrew.cmu.edu)
Date: Sun Dec 15 2002 - 21:09:25 EST

Next message: Kenton A. Hoover: "Re: [NTLK] Next steps for NewtSync? My thoughts..."
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Alternative to Dateman(TM)????"
In reply to: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] ATTENTION. Please read this."
Next in thread: Jeremy Wood: "[NTLK] NeWT & NeXT?"
Reply: Jeremy Wood: "[NTLK] NeWT & NeXT?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Sunday, December 15, 2002, at 07:16 PM, Peter Cameron wrote:

> on 12/15/02 6:19 PM, David Golden at ikondave599_at_mac.com wrote:
>> I like the idea of getting as much attention as possible focused on
>> the
>> Newton.
> I agree that attention is probably good. But fragmentation of the
> community can be a bad thing.

Precisely. They actually serve to dilute the interest and result in
fewer people making Newton (or NeXT) interpersonal connections.

-awc

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Kenton A. Hoover: "Re: [NTLK] Next steps for NewtSync? My thoughts..."
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Alternative to Dateman(TM)????"
In reply to: Peter Cameron: "Re: [NTLK] ATTENTION. Please read this."
Next in thread: Jeremy Wood: "[NTLK] NeWT & NeXT?"
Reply: Jeremy Wood: "[NTLK] NeWT & NeXT?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jan 01 2003 - 10:02:31 EST