Re: [NTLK] Re[2]: Re[2]: Convincing argument against MS

From: Eric L. Strobel (fyzycyst_at_comcast.net)
Date: Thu Jun 13 2002 - 12:26:35 EDT


on 6/13/02 12:11 PM, richard_at_cyberphotographer.com at
richard_at_cyberphotographer.com wrote:

>
>>> Pismo's graphics card is not supported to hardware-accelerate Quartz.
>
> ...so graphics are slightly slower than they might be in special
> circumstances but otherwise everything works well.
>

I think the bone of contention is that there are a far-from-negligible
number of folks who would say you should replace 'slightly' with
'substantially'...

- Eric.

-- 

Eric Strobel (fyzycyst_at_NOSPAM^mailaps.org)

===================================================================== The odds are greatly against you being immensely smarter than everyone else in the field. If your analysis says your terminal velocity is twice the speed of light, you may have invented warp drive, but the chances are a lot better that you've screwed up. =====================================================================

-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net



This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 03 2002 - 14:02:15 EDT