Re: [NTLK] Is "Newton Print Pack Cable" 1.0 or 2.0?

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_mac.com)
Date: Mon Jun 17 2002 - 09:44:46 EDT

Next message: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] weird MP 130 occurence"
Previous message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Is "Newton Print Pack Cable" 1.0 or 2.0?"
In reply to: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Is "Newton Print Pack Cable" 1.0 or 2.0?"
Next in thread: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] getting [OT] Is "Newton Print Pack Cable" 1.0 or 2.0?"
Reply: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] getting [OT] Is "Newton Print Pack Cable" 1.0 or 2.0?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 17-06-2002 3:22, Marco Mailand at Newton2k1_at_mac.com wrote:

> which is good and as it is supposed to be.

That suddenly gave me a very biblical feel ;-)

Robert Benschop

-- 
Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net

Next message: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] weird MP 130 occurence"
Previous message: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Is "Newton Print Pack Cable" 1.0 or 2.0?"
In reply to: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] Is "Newton Print Pack Cable" 1.0 or 2.0?"
Next in thread: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] getting [OT] Is "Newton Print Pack Cable" 1.0 or 2.0?"
Reply: Marco Mailand: "Re: [NTLK] getting [OT] Is "Newton Print Pack Cable" 1.0 or 2.0?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Wed Jul 03 2002 - 14:02:26 EDT