The ipaq is quicker at 206MHz compared to a MP2x000 at 162MHz. The iPaq
feels much snappier though as most Newton programs are written in
NewtonScript which is interpreted (someone correct me if I'm wrong here).
Brad
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Oberdörster (Uni) [mailto:oberdoer_at_uni-duesseldorf.de]
> Sent: 13 March 2002 11:20
> To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] Mad Max problems
>
>
>
>
> > Well, the Compaq iPaq for one can do all of this. It
> supports CF slots,
> > and CF modems/Ethernet cards exist. It also plays MP3s (128kbps and
> > faster, full ISO compliant decoding)
>
> Does anybody know how the speed of the iPaq relates to the MP2x00? I
> thought that they were roughly comparable, as they both have
> StrongArms
> running at about 200 MHz.
>
>
> Alexander
>
>
> --
> Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
> Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/
> This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
>
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:02:42 EST