on 3/14/02 2:42 PM, Eric L. Strobel at fyzycyst_at_comcast.net wrote:
>
> at the temporal coordinates: 3/14/02 3:26 PM, the entity known as Laurent
> Daudelin at laurent_daudelin_at_fanniemae.com conveyed the following:
>
>>
>> On 14/03/02 15:15, "Eric L. Strobel" <fyzycyst_at_comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> at the temporal coordinates: 3/14/02 2:59 PM, the entity known as Josh
>>> Shanks at jshanks_at_mac.com conveyed the following:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why have we given up the idea of polo shirts? I can get them for pretty
>>>> much
>>>> the same price as screen printed shirts. And that includes the emroidery. I
>>>> say we do both.
>>>>
>>>> Josh
>>>>
>>>
>>> I don't see any reason why not. There's some folks that might want one of
>>> each.
>>
>> I, for one, would much prefer to pay even a few bucks more but to get a polo
>> shirt which I would wear a lot more than just a regular t-shirt...
>>
>> So, can we do both? Any reason why Josh wouldn't be able to make them? He
>> repeatedly said he was able to offer polo shirts for almost the same price
>> than the t-shirts ones, with, from what I can tell, the same
>> printing/embroidering options.
>>
>> Victor?
>>
>
> One question, though. On the polo shirt, I assume the graphic would the
> typical smaller polo shirt thing of being on the right breast, right?
>
> - Eric.
I would be very happy to have both T - shirts and polo shirts. I would buy a
few of each.
Dave
-- Read the List FAQ/Etiquette: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Read the Newton FAQ: http://www.guns-media.com/mirrors/newton/faq/ This is the NewtonTalk mailing list - http://www.newtontalk.net
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Tue Apr 02 2002 - 14:02:50 EST