Re: [NTLK] Grant, why is this? Re: NEW THREAD: tibet question

• Next message: Andrew Ruthven: "Re: [NTLK] NuShield News"
• Previous message: Sam du Rose: "Re: [NTLK] package installation"
• In reply to: Cheezy: "Re: [NTLK] Grant, why is this? Re: NEW THREAD: tibet question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

À (At) 22:09 +0100 21/11/02, Cheezy écrivait (wrote) :
>No, TibetHack patches Tibet so that it works with other cameras.
>Personnaly, I've never seen any codes released by the editor to=20
>register TibetHack.=

I've asked Russell Tait to confirm that the registration codes were
valid and he meant to give them to the public. He confirmed and now
the codes are in the FAQ.

http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/newton-faq-hardware.html#IIB9

Paul

-- 
NPDS: http://newton.kallisys.net:8080/
Apache: http://www.kallisys.com/
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Andrew Ruthven: "Re: [NTLK] NuShield News"
• Previous message: Sam du Rose: "Re: [NTLK] package installation"
• In reply to: Cheezy: "Re: [NTLK] Grant, why is this? Re: NEW THREAD: tibet question"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Mon Dec 02 2002 - 22:03:15 EST