Re: [NTLK] Nitro vs Backtalk

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Sat Apr 12 2003 - 10:51:59 PDT

Next message: Shawn H: "[NTLK] Just FYI"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Silver Lucent w/dhcp problems"
In reply to: Eckhart Köppen: "Re: [NTLK] Nitro vs Backtalk"
Next in thread: Johannes Spielhagen: "Re: [NTLK] Nitro vs Backtalk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On donderdag, apr 10, 2003, at 21:32 Europe/Amsterdam, Eckhart K=F6ppen=20=

wrote:
> This is probably the biggest difference: Nitro and IC/VC are open=20
> source. If I decide to stop working on them (because I'm busy=20
> implementing something like a Bluetooth driver ;)

Would that be possible? Seems that the Newt would need USB first ;-)

Robert Benschop=

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Shawn H: "[NTLK] Just FYI"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] Silver Lucent w/dhcp problems"
In reply to: Eckhart Köppen: "Re: [NTLK] Nitro vs Backtalk"
Next in thread: Johannes Spielhagen: "Re: [NTLK] Nitro vs Backtalk"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 12 2003 - 11:30:00 PDT