Re: [NTLK] [OT] TiBook wireless range (compared to Newton)

From: Michael Blazer (m.blazer_at_utoronto.ca)
Date: Sat Apr 19 2003 - 20:28:55 PDT

• Next message: Adam Macks: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001's are nearly gone..."
• Previous message: Anthony Velasco: "[NTLK] Recent Barcode wand setup?"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Blazer: "[NTLK] [OT] TiBook wireless range (compared to Newton)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on 18/04/2003 3:50 PM, Jens Baumeister at jensbaumeister_at_web.de wrote:
 
> The exact steps are outlined here:
>
> http://www.dslreports.com/faq/5648
>
> I just tried it, and it really works. I used to have zero signal
> strength in my bedroom, now it's at 3/4 or sometimes even full
> strength. Color me impressed.

Thanks, Jens. I think it worked for me too. Average signal strength seems
to be up about one bar, and my connections are much more stable. Still not
perfect (e.g., not as good as the PC card in the Newton), but very usable.

Thanks to everybody for your suggestions. I love this list! And I didn't
even get flamed for being OT.

Michael

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

• Next message: Adam Macks: "Re: [NTLK] SER-001's are nearly gone..."
• Previous message: Anthony Velasco: "[NTLK] Recent Barcode wand setup?"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael Blazer: "[NTLK] [OT] TiBook wireless range (compared to Newton)"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 19 2003 - 21:00:00 PDT