Re: [NTLK] OT: exemption for obsolete platforms?

From: Brian Pearce (bpearce_at_cloud9.net)
Date: Sun Nov 02 2003 - 17:15:11 PST


> For what it's worth:
>
> Apple's Service Parts Database (assembled around 1 May 2001), list 89
> products as being "obsolete".

I believe Apple's use of the term "obsolete" would be more a reference
to products they support in some way, have parts available for, or
something related to the company's operations than any useful legal
definition.

BRIAN/bpearce_at_cloud9.net

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/


This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Nov 02 2003 - 18:30:00 PST