Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6

From: Robert Benschop (rbenschop_at_euronet.nl)
Date: Sat Oct 18 2003 - 04:58:44 PDT

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] newtontalk Digest V3 #549"
Previous message: Mark Rollins: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Hell has frozen over"
In reply to: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6"
Next in thread: Eric Schneck: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Paul Guyot wrote:
> Nevertheless, more speed could mean a faster Newton. In both cases,
> it would make ATA cards superior to linear cards (since the speed
> improvement is mostly about beating linear cards definitely).

I'm impressed, I figured that it was about getting them up to par with
the linear cards.
Guess I'll be switching to CompactFlash after all...

Robert Benschop

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] newtontalk Digest V3 #549"
Previous message: Mark Rollins: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] Hell has frozen over"
In reply to: Paul Guyot: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6"
Next in thread: Eric Schneck: "Re: [NTLK] [ANN] ATA Support 1.0RC6"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Oct 18 2003 - 05:30:01 PDT