From: doppler (roman_at_pixell.net)
Date: Wed Oct 29 2003 - 13:00:33 PST
id vote for ogg, too! its clerly the future for non-DRM tunes. considering
the compression/quality spects, its definately the format.
the fact that ogg is the choice of nerds doesnt really feel like a bad
argument for that matter ;-D
/ ®
> Subject: Re: [NTLK] AAC? Speaking of MP3's and compression
> From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Eckhart_K=F6ppen?= <eck1001_at_gmx.net>
>
>> Anyway, better compression, higher quality
>> sound, but what is known about it, and in by those that have looked
>> into this, would the Newton have the power to read this compression?
>
> Maybe, but you won't get too much benefit from AAC. It's supposedly
> better than MP3 only for bitrates higher than 128kbit/s. And that is
> not economical to store on the Newton. Much more interesting is
> Ogg/Vorbis which is better at low bitrates. Some people say that 64kbit
> Ogg = 128kbit MP3...
roman pixell
_________karmatic_experience_group__
mailto: roman_at_pixell.net
phone: +46 (0) 8 242 606
fax: +46 (0) 8 598 14 954
cell: +46 (0) 709 10 35 51
web: www.pixell.net/doppler
icq user number: 3698764
____________________________________
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Oct 29 2003 - 13:30:01 PST