Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2

From: David M. Ensteness (denstene_at_mac.com)
Date: Sun Sep 07 2003 - 13:01:05 PDT

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Clicking on the link for the Mac download of dateman takes you to a 404
page not found.

David

On Sunday, September 7, 2003, at 01:49 PM, Robert Benschop wrote:

> Paul Miller wrote:
>> So is a full version of Dateman available?
>
> http://www.standalone.com/newtonos/index.shtml

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Previous message: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] A better Dates package? Issue #2"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Sep 07 2003 - 14:00:00 PDT