From: josh musket (jmusket_at_nmu.edu)
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 09:06:41 PDT
kareljansens wrote:
>Op maandag 5 april 2004 17:07, schreef francoventimiglia_at_iol.it:
>
>
>>Possible New Name for Possible New Newton: iSaac
>>
>>
>Methinks anything but "Hawking" should not even be considered.
>(although I could live with L-Bert)
>Karel Jansens
>
>
Uck. Hawking? iSaac? The Newton isn't a physics churning prodigy. At
least since no one's ported sand to it. Personally, I think we should
have a new newton before we name it, eh?
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 09:30:01 PDT