Re: [NTLK] Slowdown.exe Not Necessary?

From: Jon Glass (jonglass_at_usa.net)
Date: Sat Aug 28 2004 - 22:04:19 PDT

Next message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] [k]racking ata-support TROLL ALERT!"
Previous message: Tony Kan: "Re: [NTLK] Courier connection slip"
In reply to: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Slowdown.exe Not Necessary?"
Next in thread: Steele Campbell: "Re: [NTLK] Slowdown.exe Not Necessary?"
Reply: Steele Campbell: "Re: [NTLK] Slowdown.exe Not Necessary?"
Reply: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] Slowdown.exe Not Necessary?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Aug 29, 2004, at 5:21 AM, Brian wrote:

> Actually some time ago there were posts on the list indicating that
> proper setting of serial buffers was all that was needed for package
> install to work; also without slowdown.
>

Not speaking from experience with Windows XP (I have a Mac) I always
thought that the true test of Slowdown.exe was a full backup. Steele.
Have you tried to back up your Newt yet? See if that "breaks" your
connection. That would seem to be the true test. :-)

-- 
-Jon Glass
Krakow, Poland
<jonglass_at_usa.net>
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] [k]racking ata-support TROLL ALERT!"
Previous message: Tony Kan: "Re: [NTLK] Courier connection slip"
In reply to: Brian: "Re: [NTLK] Slowdown.exe Not Necessary?"
Next in thread: Steele Campbell: "Re: [NTLK] Slowdown.exe Not Necessary?"
Reply: Steele Campbell: "Re: [NTLK] Slowdown.exe Not Necessary?"
Reply: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] Slowdown.exe Not Necessary?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 29 2004 - 10:30:01 PDT