Re: [NTLK] landware closes 9th

From: Roman Pixell (roman_at_pixell.net)
Date: Wed Feb 04 2004 - 07:15:31 PST

Next message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] Phew!"
Previous message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] Isaacs Dates vs. TimeTraxx? [was Re: iambic"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] landware closes 9th"
Next in thread: Johannes Wolf: "Re: [NTLK] landware closes 9th"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 3 feb 2004, at 07.49, Robert Benschop wrote:

> So did you gibe Address Access a try before going for QN?
>

no i didnt, which was a mistake...

/ ®

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] Phew!"
Previous message: Roman Pixell: "Re: [NTLK] Isaacs Dates vs. TimeTraxx? [was Re: iambic"
In reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] landware closes 9th"
Next in thread: Johannes Wolf: "Re: [NTLK] landware closes 9th"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Feb 04 2004 - 07:30:00 PST