From: Joshua Johnston (joshua_at_bowdownbefore.us)
Date: Sun Feb 08 2004 - 00:46:44 PST
Heck, these days if audio quality was -that- important I'd just use
night and weekend minutes on my cellphone, with video over the net if
required. The only problem there is the delay between audio and video
you'd see there. iChat AV worked great for me a couple weeks ago, Mac
to Mac from NH to NY. I'd try it with someone on a PC, but none of the
PC friends I have any distance away actually have a camera and
broadband.
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert Benschop [mailto:rbenschop_at_euronet.nl]
Sent: Sunday, February 08, 2004 3:36 AM
To: newtontalk_at_newtontalk.net
Subject: Re: [NTLK] OT: audio/voice conferencing on the internet
On 8-feb-04, at 4:50, gooddog_at_interlync.com wrote:
> We have a shareware called Squidcam, but we haven't been able to make
> this work. We're working with the guy who made it up to help our
cause.
> So far, though, we are dead in the water.
Why not? I use it all of the time and it's excellent. Basically just
enter the IP address of the other party and away you go. Mind that if
you use a router that you have to open the ports for Squidcam...
Much better audio quality compared to iChat AV in my experience.
Robert Benschop
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Feb 08 2004 - 01:30:00 PST