Re: [NTLK] [OT] What is a Metro-sexual (was: What the heck's a man-bag?)

From: Norman Palardy (palardyn_at_shaw.ca)
Date: Sat Jan 17 2004 - 21:09:55 PST

Next message: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] What the heck's a man-bag?"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] What the heck's a man-bag?"
In reply to: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] What is a Metro-sexual (was: What the heck's a man-bag?)"
Next in thread: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] What the heck's a man-bag?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On 17-Jan-04, at 10:03 PM, Ed Kummel wrote:

> Metro-sexual...

sorry but I think this is just another contrived term
probably sprung from some fashion industry "guru's" lips and now
everyone uses it

and, unlike homosexual, heterosexual, etc it has nothing to do with
sexual preferences

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
List FAQ/Etiquette/Terms: http://www.newtontalk.net/faq.html
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/

Next message: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] What the heck's a man-bag?"
Previous message: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] What the heck's a man-bag?"
In reply to: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] What is a Metro-sexual (was: What the heck's a man-bag?)"
Next in thread: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] What the heck's a man-bag?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 17 2004 - 21:30:01 PST