Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest

From: Peter Cameron (pdwc_at_sympatico.ca)
Date: Sun May 16 2004 - 07:21:59 PDT

Next message: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] Package Extraction"
Previous message: William Ove: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Robert Benschop wrote:
>Sounds like a good idea, in that case I would propose to have the
>digest without OT all together, what do Victor and digest users think
>about this?
     I'd prefer to have the OT in digests for a couple of reasons:
     A) They occasionally stray back to on topic.
     B) Some OTs are fun and I'd hate to miss one while in digest mode on
vacation.

Peter

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Dan: "Re: [NTLK] Package Extraction"
Previous message: William Ove: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Maybe in reply to: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Next in thread: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Reply: Robert Benschop: "Re: [NTLK] OT on the list and in the digest"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun May 16 2004 - 09:00:04 PDT