Re: [NTLK] [OT] OQO for Newton? NO!

From: Martin Joseph (martyNT_at_barknaturalpet.com)
Date: Sat Oct 16 2004 - 10:07:52 PDT

Next message: j g: "Re: [NTLK] Siemens Note Phone"
Previous message: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] ssh, ssl, and other secure software?"
In reply to: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Next in thread: Sonny Hung: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] OQO for Newton? NO!"
Reply: Sonny Hung: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] OQO for Newton? NO!"
Reply: karel Jansens: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] OQO for Newton? NO!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Oct 15, 2004, at 5:17 PM, Ed Kummel wrote:

> LAG, I have to agree with you here..
> <snip>

You guys are missing the point completely.

Did you read the thread where I said OSX isn't good for a palm top?
It's for the exact same reasons.

A hardware platform design to run windows is INAPPROPRIATE for a
PDA/Newton.

Even Microsoft agrees with this, that's why they have
WindowsCE/PocketPC.

Marty

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: j g: "Re: [NTLK] Siemens Note Phone"
Previous message: James Nichols: "Re: [NTLK] ssh, ssl, and other secure software?"
In reply to: Ed Kummel: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] NYT carrier OQO review by David Pogue"
Next in thread: Sonny Hung: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] OQO for Newton? NO!"
Reply: Sonny Hung: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] OQO for Newton? NO!"
Reply: karel Jansens: "Re: [NTLK] [OT] OQO for Newton? NO!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Oct 17 2004 - 06:00:02 PDT