From: smoerk (smoerk_at_gmail.com)
Date: Tue Sep 07 2004 - 08:21:24 PDT
I apologize for what i wrote in my last mail. I think I know too less
about the topic and of course Paul and Nicolas can choose the license
of their project. I was just a little bit dissapointed, that it's not
open source (but somhow I expected it).
On Tue, 7 Sep 2004 13:07:51 +0200, smoerk <smoerk_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> I assumed that this will happen. My intuition says, that Einstein will
> not be successful without open sourcing it or there will be someone
> who will write an Einstein clone. I will wait until I read (or watched
> your presentation) until I give more comments on it.
>
> Question is: Will you try to open source it? Which means, will you try
> to convince Apple, that you would like to open source Einstein, if
> Apple will agree with it?
>
-- Oliver T. looking for a Newton 2100 -- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 07 2004 - 08:30:01 PDT