Re: [NTLK] Vintage, what about B-52s?

From: Peter Fraser (pjfraser_at_mac.com)
Date: Tue Sep 14 2004 - 12:13:37 PDT

Next message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Vintage, what about space technology"
Previous message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] Vintage, what about space technology"
In reply to: jg: "[NTLK] Vintage, what about space technology"
Next in thread: Dale A. Raby: "Re: [NTLK] Vintage, what about B-52s?"
Reply: Dale A. Raby: "Re: [NTLK] Vintage, what about B-52s?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

and i guess we don't want to even talk about B-52 bombers...some of them are from what, 1957?

On Tuesday, September 14, 2004, at 11:50AM, jg <atcnn2_at_yahoo.se> wrote:

>Hi everyone,
>
>If 6 or 7 years old technology, fully functional, is VINTAGE, so I raise
>a question. How old is space shuttle technology? Answer: 12 to 15 years
>or more? Thats realy VINTAGE.

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Vintage, what about space technology"
Previous message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] Vintage, what about space technology"
In reply to: jg: "[NTLK] Vintage, what about space technology"
Next in thread: Dale A. Raby: "Re: [NTLK] Vintage, what about B-52s?"
Reply: Dale A. Raby: "Re: [NTLK] Vintage, what about B-52s?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 14 2004 - 12:30:02 PDT