Re: [NTLK] Passing on ROM images

From: Peter H. Coffin (hellsop_at_ninehells.com)
Date: Sat Jan 29 2005 - 09:23:33 PST

Next message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] What is the slimmest case for the 2100?"
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Passing on ROM images"
In reply to: Sonny Hung: "Re: [NTLK] Passing on ROM images"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 11:47:22AM -0500, Sonny Hung wrote:
> A suggestion & question at the same time.
>
> Would it be better if a person confirm that a newt user actually had
> at least a ROM board before giving them a ROM dump or should we just
> avoid this possibility completely?

Dumping the rom themselves should be pretty good evidence of having the
ROM. I'm happy with that limitation.

-- 
For why should my freedom be judged by another's conscience?  
			    -- Paul (I Corinthians 10:29)
-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/

Next message: Peter H. Coffin: "Re: [NTLK] What is the slimmest case for the 2100?"
Previous message: Martin Joseph: "Re: [NTLK] Passing on ROM images"
In reply to: Sonny Hung: "Re: [NTLK] Passing on ROM images"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Jan 29 2005 - 10:00:01 PST