To a point I agree with this; however and this is not intended to flame anyone. Is the reason some people are not considering the iPhone is simply because its not a Newton?
Ive wondered this since the phone was announced
Mark
(resent because parts got chopped off!)
On Friday, April 27, 2007, at 08:16AM, "Mark Harter" <willmark@mac.com> wrote:
>Ive wondered this since the phone was announced
>
>Mark
>
>On Friday, April 27, 2007, at 06:58AM, "Lord Groundhog" <LordGroundhog@gmail.com> wrote:
>>~~~ On 2007/04/27 07:16, andy hill at adhill@fastmail.co.uk wrote ~~~
>>
>>> There's a big part of me that feels born in the wrong era!
>>
>>
>>Awww, I bet you missed Woodstock too. Too bad, it was really good. ;)
>>
>>But seriously, you're right. The nice thing about a vintage motorbike is
>>that it does what you really want from it without distracting you with a
>>bunch of bells, whistles and flashing lights that don't do anything except
>>say, "Hey! I'm new!".
>>
>>Same with the Newton. The triumph of function over froth.
>>
>>Shalom.
>>Christian
>>
>>~~~ ~~~ ~~~
>>
>>łAny sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a NewtonPad.˛
>> -- What Arthur C. Clarke meant to say
>>
>>http://homepage.mac.com/chodlang1/iMovieTheater16.html
>>(With thanks to Chod Lang)
>>http://tinyurl.com/29y2dl
>>
-- This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/ WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/Received on Fri Apr 27 08:24:26 2007
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Fri Apr 27 2007 - 10:30:01 EDT