Re: [NTLK] 2000 vs 2100 performance benchmarks

For a feature comparison see FAQ
<http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/newton-faq-hardware.html>
  I am not aware of benchmarks being done other than the specs of the
processors and ram. But since you are concerned with internet you
will likely only be considering ethernet capable units which are the
eMate 300 and 2x00.
Other than system RAM (heap) there is no difference between the 2000
and the 2100. The upgraded 2000 and 2100 are functionally identical,
you will see different markings on the case.

Woody

On Feb 25, 2007, at 12:45 PM, Eldee Stephens wrote:

> folks,
>
> after searching through the archives (and google), i haven't been able
> to find any performance comparisons between various messagepad models
> -- 120 vs 130, or 2000 vs 2100 for example. knowing that i will be
> moving to either an upgraded MP2000 or acquiring a used MP2100 soon, i
> wonder if the list would be interested in me performing some basic
> 'benchmarks' between those two units.
>

>
> -- eldee
>
>

-- 
This is the NewtonTalk list - http://www.newtontalk.net/ for all inquiries
Official Newton FAQ: http://www.chuma.org/newton/faq/
WikiWikiNewt for all kinds of articles: http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/