Re: [NTLK] eMate vs. 2100

hi ryan,

i don't have the 2100 - just the 2000 - and an emate. i'm loving both, but
in case of a lonesome island i would take the 2000:
- the emate is (even with the accelarating rom-board) really slow
- you can't connect a memory card and a lan-/wifi-card at one time
- it is too large for a (regulary) vest pocket ;-)
- the battery is hard mounted

but for typing a lot of text, i'm loving the integrated keyboard of the
emate and also the „hardware“-buttons for scrolling etc..

please excuse my poor english (poor knowledge - not a poor recognition),
jan

newtontalk@newtontalk.net schreibt:
>I know, probably done on here before, although I did a search and checked
>out some previous threads on this topic.
>Anyone love their eMate?† Love it over their 2100?† I know both are sort
>of different.† Is the eMate that much slower?† What your responses be to
>this review:
>
>http://static.the-gadgeteer.com/apple-emate-300-review.html
>
>Agree, disagree?
>
>Ryan

====================================================================
The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/
The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/
The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/
WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
====================================================================
Received on Fri Sep 5 05:13:41 2008