[NTLK] 2010 patch: an urgent question

[Martin Gomez]

http://40hz.org/Pages/Patch%20Remover

On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 10:16 PM, Lord Groundhog <LordGroundhog at gmail.com>wrote:

>
> While I'm on the subject, my Newts (which I MUST patch this week) say "ROM
> Version 2.1 (710031)-1".  Two of them, I've had for a fair while -- one
> from
> 2005.  I have no knowledge of how either of them could have gotten the
> 710031 patch; I've never been told by a seller that he'd patched any Newt I
> have, and I've never patched one.  Was 710031 even available before 2005
> July?  If not, what's on my Newts?  And what should I do about it, since I
> can't see how it could be the patch I'm supposed to be removing?
>
> TIA.
>
>
>
> Shalom.
> Christian
>
> ~~~ ~~~ ~~~
>
> ³Any sufficiently advanced magic is indistinguishable from a Newton.²
>            -- what Arthur C. Clarke meant
>
> http://youtube.com/watch?v=1ZzpdPJ7Zr4
> (With thanks to Chod Lang)
> http://tinyurl.com/29y2dl
> http://www.diyplanner.com/node/3942
>
> ~~~ ~~~ ~~~
> Fight Spam.  Join EuroCAUCE: http://www.euro.cauce.org/
> Get MUGged and love it: http://www.oxmug.org/
> Join today: http://www.newtontalk.net/
>
>
>
>
>
> ====================================================================
> The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://newtontalk.net/
> The Official Newton FAQ     - http://splorp.com/newton/faq/
> The Newton Glossary         - http://splorp.com/newton/glossary/
> WikiWikiNewt                - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/
> ====================================================================
>



-- 
If debugging is the process of removing bugs, then programming must be the
process of putting them in.