It is the nature of a wiki that an article changes over time to reflect
a group consensus. If you think the timeline was a good thing, by all
means put it back. You should be able to pull up a history of changes.
On my wiki you click on the "History" tab at the top of the page. I am
guessing the timeline was a graphic, and I have no idea if that is still
available in the history. More at
<http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Help:Reverting>
Is this the timeline in question?
<http://myapplenewton.blogspot.com/2009/01/newton-timeline.html>
-- Gary Dunn, Honolulu osp@aloha.com http://openslate.net/ http://e9erust.blogspot.com/ Sent from Slate001 On Sat, 2009-01-03 at 12:25 +1300, Tony Kan wrote: > OK, I acknowledge it wasn't complete but it was better than nothing. Until > someone comes out with a more exhaustive timeline, it would be still useful to > present what information we have without losing it altogether? > > Just trying to be constructive... > > Tony > > [snip] > > It's me who started this movement. The article was incorrectly named and too > MessagePad-specific so I (HorvatM on Wikipedia), along with some other Wikipedia > members, started to change things. I did not, however remove the timeline, but I > think it wasn't good anyway since it only listed MessagePads and the eMate, and > it didn't include ExpertPads, the Marco, and such. > > -Matej Horvat ==================================================================== The NewtonTalk Mailing List - http://www.newtontalk.net/ The Official Newton FAQ - http://www.splorp.com/newton/faq/ The Newton Glossary - http://www.splorp.com/newton/glossary/ WikiWikiNewt - http://tools.unna.org/wikiwikinewt/ ====================================================================Received on Wed Jan 14 03:37:26 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Wed Jan 14 2009 - 12:30:00 EST