>> My question is which is better Basilisk or Fusion?
>
>Well, since Basilisk is free, and Fusion isn't...I'd have to pick Bas.
>Besides, installing Fusion and getting support for CD-ROM/Mouse/etc. is
>trickier. You have to mess with DOS, and you have to have the drivers for
>your CD and Mouse loading.
>
>Basilisk will at least run under Windows. Performance seems about the same.
>
Basilisk is also written by my favorite emulator author, C. Bauer, who
wrote the Shapeshifter IIci emulator for my amiga 2000/030, which enabled
me to get about 3 years additional useful life out of the machine. And got
me hooked on Macs, too :)
Brian
******************************************
This NewtonTalk Message brought to you by:
EVOTE.COM, the ESPN of Politics on the
Internet. Visit EVOTE.COM for all the latest
news on Campaign 2000!
Visit http://www.evote.com today!
******************************************
Need Subscribe/Unsubscribe Info?
visit http://www.planetnewton.com
******************************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed May 03 2000 - 09:41:15 EDT