Re: [NTLK] MessagePad 2000 or 2100 BACKLIGHT brightness/luminance VS. eMate BACKLIGHT brightness/luminance!

From: Michael J. Hußmann (michael_at_michael-hussmann.de)
Date: Mon Aug 06 2001 - 15:30:41 EDT

Next message: martin weiss: "[NTLK] Backing up and synchronizing revisited"
Previous message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] Re - MP120 charging question"
In reply to: Gary Zambrano: "[NTLK] MessagePad 2000 or 2100 BACKLIGHT brightness/luminance VS. eMate BACKLIGHT brightness/luminance!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Gary Zambrano (Gazam_at_mac.com) wrote:

> Or could it simply be that the eMate with it's larger screen and large=
r
> pixels make it really just brighter than the MP2x000 originally.

Gary,

I don't use the backlight much, neither on the MP2100 nor the eMate, and=

the brightness of both is about the same.

- Michael

Michael J. Hu=DFmann

E-mail: michael_at_michael-hussmann.de
WWW: http://michael-hussmann.de

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: martin weiss: "[NTLK] Backing up and synchronizing revisited"
Previous message: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] Re - MP120 charging question"
In reply to: Gary Zambrano: "[NTLK] MessagePad 2000 or 2100 BACKLIGHT brightness/luminance VS. eMate BACKLIGHT brightness/luminance!"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:46:46 EDT