Re: [NTLK] wearing out internal memory? (longish)

From: Victor Rehorst (victor_at_newtontalk.net)
Date: Tue Aug 07 2001 - 10:34:33 EDT

Next message: Marc Weinberg: "Re: [NTLK] Donation"
Previous message: Oliver Hardt: "Re: [NTLK] problems with ethernet card 3Com 3C562D/3C563D"
In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] wearing out internal memory? (longish)"
Next in thread: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] wearing out internal memory? (longish)"
Reply: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] wearing out internal memory? (longish)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tue, 7 Aug 2001, Eric L. Strobel wrote:

> The key there is "What is the block size?" If it's some reasonable size (~
> 1K) then I expect you'll never notice the loss of something smaller than one
> percent of your memory. (unless, of course, something very important is
> there...)

Block size for all linear flash, IIRC, is 64KB.

-- Victor Rehorst - victor_at_newtontalk.net - chuma_at_chuma.org NewtonTalk list administrator - http://www.newtontalk.net Will help you with your list problems - as long as you're nice.

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Marc Weinberg: "Re: [NTLK] Donation"
Previous message: Oliver Hardt: "Re: [NTLK] problems with ethernet card 3Com 3C562D/3C563D"
In reply to: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] wearing out internal memory? (longish)"
Next in thread: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] wearing out internal memory? (longish)"
Reply: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] wearing out internal memory? (longish)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:46:48 EDT