Re: [NTLK] Benefits of footnote-package

From: Eric L. Strobel (fyzycyst_at_home.com)
Date: Fri Aug 10 2001 - 09:21:18 EDT

Next message: PSorrells_at_aol.com: "[NTLK] new reader with big problem"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Benefits of footnote-package"
In reply to: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Benefits of footnote-package"
Next in thread: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] Benefits of footnote-package"
Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] Benefits of footnote-package"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

on or about 8/10/01 9:16 AM, the following may or may not have been typed by
Victor Rehorst at victor_at_newtontalk.net:

> On Fri, 10 Aug 2001, Eric L. Strobel wrote:
>
>> Good heavens! I can't begin to imagine doing that. Not to denigrate our
>> Newts, but really now. First, most refereed journals nowadays want
>> electronic submission (TeX, sometimes PDF or Word), and you're going to have
>
> Newton speaks LaTeX:
>
> http://newyork.unna.org/unna/development/languages/LaTeX/ViewMP/

Cool! Then perhaps isn't THIS the answer to the whole footnotes issue??

- Eric.

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: PSorrells_at_aol.com: "[NTLK] new reader with big problem"
Previous message: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Benefits of footnote-package"
In reply to: Victor Rehorst: "Re: [NTLK] Benefits of footnote-package"
Next in thread: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] Benefits of footnote-package"
Reply: Jon Glass: "Re: [NTLK] Benefits of footnote-package"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:46:58 EDT