Re: [NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)

From: rminton_at_commscope.com
Date: Mon Aug 20 2001 - 14:18:01 EDT

Next message: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] A Messagepad for my wife! But which one?!"
Previous message: Brad Tober: "Re: [NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Maybe in reply to: Tom Wilkinson: "[NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

>I was comparing the screen contrast of my MP120 to my friend's 2000 over the
weekend, and >my 120 seemed quite a bit brighter when compared to the 2000
without using the backlight. >Is my friend's 2000 misadjusted. She tried
adjusting the contrast, but without the >backlight, she could not make it near
as bright as the MP120.
>Any thoughts on this?
>Tom

Nope, it's real. The contrast on the 120 is better than the backlit models.
I've got a 120, a 130 and a 2001 and the 120 definitely has better contrast in
ambient light. Probably a trade off for having a less reflective background so
that the backlight can shine through.

Randy

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Samuel Jacobson: "Re: [NTLK] A Messagepad for my wife! But which one?!"
Previous message: Brad Tober: "Re: [NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Maybe in reply to: Tom Wilkinson: "[NTLK] MP120 contrast vs. 2000 (without backlighting)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:47:25 EDT