Re: [NTLK] Newton accelerator

• Next message: Jim Johnston: "[NTLK] Unset newtontalk vacation"
• Previous message: markmontoya_at_mindspring.com: "[NTLK] 2 4MB cards on ebay"
• Maybe in reply to: Tom Doan: "[NTLK] Newton accelerator"
• Next in thread: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] Newton accelerator"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Woo wrote:

<snip>
> *Only disadvantages are serial and IrDA ports are out of
> sync.(but somebody
> said two accel. units could IrDA) and 'sounds' are higher
> pitch.

Yes, the comms data rate is raised by New Clk/Old Clk ratio.
True, beaming between modified units is still possible BUT
it requires the same speed on both. If one unit is overclocked more
than another then no dice.
Recordings are played back at normal rate if the clock remains the same
during recording/playback.
System sounds are not.

<snip>
> Oliver should send you a slower board. Mine is
> running 215-Mhz.

This means that you have a 4.9152MHz crystal fitted.
This is good.
It means that you may be able to use serial and keyboard when
accelerated. :-)

I am working on it.

Regards,

David Humphreys

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

• Next message: Jim Johnston: "[NTLK] Unset newtontalk vacation"
• Previous message: markmontoya_at_mindspring.com: "[NTLK] 2 4MB cards on ebay"
• Maybe in reply to: Tom Doan: "[NTLK] Newton accelerator"
• Next in thread: Woo Lee: "Re: [NTLK] Newton accelerator"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:49:58 EDT