Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence

From: Adrian Carter (adi_at_cix.co.uk)
Date: Sat Jul 21 2001 - 15:19:40 EDT

Next message: durgeles: "[NTLK] I'm desperated"
Previous message: THX 1138: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
In reply to: Ivan T. Shaw: "[NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Next in thread: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Reply: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

What was the guy's face like when you helped him out :)

Well done

Adi

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: durgeles: "[NTLK] I'm desperated"
Previous message: THX 1138: "Re: [NTLK] uMP2000/2100 vs. eMate"
In reply to: Ivan T. Shaw: "[NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Next in thread: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Reply: Ivan T. Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:50:06 EDT