Re: [NTLK] Timereporter for Newton

• Next message: Ivan Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
• Previous message: Thomas Hart: "Re: [NTLK] Small Talk"
• Maybe in reply to: Nathan Louwagie: "[NTLK] Timereporter for Newton"
• Next in thread: John M. Powell: "Re: [NTLK] Timereporter for Newton"
• Reply: John M. Powell: "Re: [NTLK] Timereporter for Newton"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Fri, Jul 27 2001 Mark Rollins wrote:
>I don't know of it, but I thought SOMEONE had permission to
>post the Iambic passwords. Anyone?

I can't be certain, but I think it was Gary Moody who received a set of Newton passcodes from someone at iambic. However, it was later discovered that the iambic fellow didn't have the authority to distribute the passcodes, so they disappeared.

It may be wortha shot in contacting iambic but something tells me that it will be an energy waster.

--
Ivan T. Shaw, PhD
http://www3.sympatico.ca/ishaw
Propolis is "bee glue."
--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

• Next message: Ivan Shaw: "Re: [NTLK] So much for presumed obsolescence"
• Previous message: Thomas Hart: "Re: [NTLK] Small Talk"
• Maybe in reply to: Nathan Louwagie: "[NTLK] Timereporter for Newton"
• Next in thread: John M. Powell: "Re: [NTLK] Timereporter for Newton"
• Reply: John M. Powell: "Re: [NTLK] Timereporter for Newton"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sun Sep 09 2001 - 19:50:23 EDT