Re: [NTLK] Developers: Have you considered porting Gecko?

From: Eckhart Koeppen (eck1000_at_gmx.net)
Date: Mon Nov 26 2001 - 17:03:57 EST

Next message: James Elliott: "Re: [NTLK] newtontalk Digest V1 #365"
Previous message: greenguy: "Re: [NTLK] I'm Back!!"
In reply to: David Orriss Jr: "[NTLK] Developers: Have you considered porting Gecko?"
Next in thread: Daniel Padilla: "Re: [NTLK] Developers: Have you considered porting Gecko?"
Reply: Daniel Padilla: "Re: [NTLK] Developers: Have you considered porting Gecko?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

David Orriss Jr wrote:

> Gecko is the rendering engine that is the core of Mozilla. Have any of the
> developers here considered making a new browser that sits on that
> engine? I'd pay money for that....

I have thought about it, but the memory requirements are simply too high
(both static code and dynamically allocated data).

Eckhart

-- -- eck_at_40hz.org -- www.40hz.org --

-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: James Elliott: "Re: [NTLK] newtontalk Digest V1 #365"
Previous message: greenguy: "Re: [NTLK] I'm Back!!"
In reply to: David Orriss Jr: "[NTLK] Developers: Have you considered porting Gecko?"
Next in thread: Daniel Padilla: "Re: [NTLK] Developers: Have you considered porting Gecko?"
Reply: Daniel Padilla: "Re: [NTLK] Developers: Have you considered porting Gecko?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:03:55 EST