Re: [NTLK] P-USB x SER001

From: James Elliott (rootbeeraddict_at_yahoo.com)
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 16:05:37 EST

Next message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] Potential for large number of bounced messages?"
Previous message: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Potential for large number of bounced messages?"
In reply to: Fábio Palma: "[NTLK] P-USB x SER001"
Next in thread: Fábio Palma: "Re: [NTLK] P-USB x SER001"
Reply: Fábio Palma: "Re: [NTLK] P-USB x SER001"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Would the P-USB allow an accelerated 2100 to transfer at a faster
rate than with serial? Or am I missing something about having to
slow them down for serial transfer?

-James

>It's impossible to icrease the serial speed without any changes in
>the hardware,

The James Elliott Newton Site:
http://www.geocities.com/rootbeeraddict/newton.html
Is that a Newton in your pocket, or are you happy to see me?

--
This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net
To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or
	mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe

Next message: Laurent Daudelin: "Re: [NTLK] Potential for large number of bounced messages?"
Previous message: Eric L. Strobel: "Re: [NTLK] Potential for large number of bounced messages?"
In reply to: Fábio Palma: "[NTLK] P-USB x SER001"
Next in thread: Fábio Palma: "Re: [NTLK] P-USB x SER001"
Reply: Fábio Palma: "Re: [NTLK] P-USB x SER001"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Sat Dec 01 2001 - 20:04:10 EST