I believe that Sean has a WABA implemented benchmark
test for the Newton that will return some quite
accurate numbers.
How about it Sean, you got some numbers that will
either confirm or debunk this information below?
Ed
web/gadget guru
--- Adam Warner <lists_at_consulting.net.nz> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Check out the MP2100 specifications here:
>
>
http://www.unna.org/unna/apple/documentation/messagepad2100.sp.pdf
>
> Specifically:
> CPU StrongARM SA-110 RISC processor
> 162 MHz
>
> NB: The document says "Unless noted in the
> specifications subheading,
> product specifications are the same for both the
> Apple MessagePad 2000
> and the Apple MessagePad 2100."
>
> Now check out this document:
>
>
http://www.unna.org/unna/apple/documentation/MessagePad2000.sea.hqx
>
> CPU StrongARM 32-bit RISC processor
> 167.9 MHz
>
> This info appears in two places in this document.
>
> The information doesn't appear to have been
> discussed before. For
> example this search:
>
>
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=messagepad+2000+167.9+MHz&btnG=Google+Search
>
> (for messagepad 2000 167.9 MHz)
>
> and variants such as MP2000, MP2k turns up zero
> hits.
>
> My guess is that all MP2x00 Newtons are marginally
> overclocked to 167.9
> MHz.
>
> Since the difference is under 4% you'd need
> benchmark software to test
> for this.
>
> Regards,
> Adam
=====
note: This does not constitute a sig file...
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Make a great connection at Yahoo! Personals.
http://personals.yahoo.com
-- This is the Newtontalk mailinglist - http://www.newtontalk.net To unsubscribe or manage: visit the above link or mailto:newtontalk-request_at_newtontalk.net?Subject=unsubscribe
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.2 : Thu Nov 01 2001 - 10:02:23 EST